Aug 30, 2012
It's almost September, which around here also means that is time for classic movie haiku! I loved doing this last year, so I'm back for another month of three-line fun. Every Monday, Wednesday and Friday I'll be posting a new haiku.
And there's more haiku-related news! (Can you ever have too much?)
I've just published my second ebook: Classic Movie Haiku. It's available on Smashwords and a screaming deal at 99 cents! Most of the 100 haiku have been written especially for the book, though I have also included everything I've posted here.
It comes in loads of formats, including Kindle, Epub, PDF and online reading. Basically, if you have a reader or a computer, you should be able to access it.
Check it out--and if you like what you see, please consider leaving a review or throwing me a Facebook like at Smashwords!
Don't forget that you can still download my first ebook: Classic Hollywood Wit for free at Smashwords as well.
Aug 26, 2012
When we worked together on The Tender Trap I was engaged to marry Eddie Fisher and Frank [Sinatra] took me to lunch and said: "Sweetie, don’t get married. Don’t marry a singer. We’re nice guys but we’re not good husbands."
Image Source, Quote Source
Aug 23, 2012
Marilyn: The Passion and the Paradox
We've lived with the legend of Marilyn Monroe much longer than she was physically with us. Her hold on pop culture has been so powerful that it some ways, it feels like she is more alive as an icon that she ever was as a woman. There have been so many books written about her and theories made about her life that it is often difficult to know what to believe. Who was this woman who continues to fascinate us fifty years after her death? In Marilyn: The Passion and the Paradox, Lois Banner examines the fine details of Monroe's life, looking for truth and attempting to understand this complex woman.
Marilyn tells Monroe's story from birth to death and beyond with a fresh, detailed approach. Banner has combined the best she could find of existing research and done her own detective work to fill out Monroe's story. She digs deep to find answers about the mysteries of her life, from her complicated childhood to her abrupt death, which Banner does not believe to be a suicide.
The biggest revelation for me in Marilyn was that she was not as alone as I'd thought. I've always seen her as an abandoned child with no one to care for her, then a starlet struggling on her own in Hollywood and finally, a lonely woman dying in bed. I'm sure part of this misconception is that I bought the tale Monroe told the media, where she liked to cast herself as the forlorn orphan.
As she became increasingly famous, Monroe gathered a collection of friends from all walks of life. She picked up families where she could, from the clans of her boyfriends to the famous Strasbergs of the Actor's Studio.
Though Marilyn was an advocate for free love (Banner thinks she would have appreciated the hippy movement of the 60s) and sexually promiscuous, she also had several platonic male friends. She loved intellectuals, but her strongest relationships were with those who stayed loyal to her, from her sympathetic personal masseuse to the almost fatherly Joe Di Maggio who alternately protected and menaced Monroe. She eventually collected so many friends that she couldn't keep up with all of them, much to the annoyance of former co-star Jane Russell, with whom she'd made a connection on the set of Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953).
|Marilyn and Jane Russell
The darker passages of Marilyn often revolve around the way Monroe was mistreated by powerful men, and particularly Darryl Zanuck and Twentieth-Century Fox. Marilyn slept with a lot of men on her way to the top, and while she was not the only star to fall prey to the casting couch, the abandon with which she approached sex earned the permanent disgust of studio executives. Even while she made a fortune for them, they looked upon her as a slut and she had to fight for herself as if she hadn't made it to the top.
|Marilyn with Joe Di Maggio
Marilyn was also tormented by painful endometrioses and the fear that she would become mentally unhinged like her mother. Eventually, she would become addicted to several kinds of prescription pills, which she would take in increasing amounts so that she could sleep, wake up or simply make it through the day. She would sometimes show up to the set in a fog.
Banner approaches these issues and the events of Marilyn's life in a variety of ways. She is primarily an investigative reporter, digging through archives of unpublished material and interviewing subjects who rarely, if ever, receive the attention of Monroe biographers. She is wisely skeptical, and the caution she takes to get the details right did much to inspire my trust. Banner also makes her own speculations about Monroe's reasons for her behavior. While I appreciated her insight, I found these passages to be weaker. Her lengthy explanations of the history Christian Science and other key elements of Monroe's life and philosophies were interesting, but had an unnecessary level of detail which I felt distracted from Marilyn's story.
Since Monroe has always had a remarkable relationship with the camera, I particularly liked a chapter in which Banner analyzed a collection of her photographs. This was a brilliant way to draw out some of Marilyn's complexities. These shots are included in the book in color, something I've never seen in a biography, and which I appreciated given the attention they received in the text.
Overall, this is an astonishingly complex work. It provides an unusually diverse portrait of Marilyn as a curious, social and intelligent woman, often beaten by life, but who persisted in her quest for love, respect and professional satisfaction. Beneath that glamorous shell was a woman far more interesting than the gloss of her legend. I'm glad Banner introduced her to us.
Thank you to Bloomsbury for providing a copy of the book for review.
Aug 19, 2012
I'm beginning to believe that, in films, what everyone is striving for is to produce moments - not a performance, not a characterisation, not something where you get into the part - you produce moments that create a feeling of believability to what you're doing.
Image Source, Quote Source
Aug 12, 2012
Aug 5, 2012
Aug 1, 2012
For years I've been hearing about Katharine Hepburn's marvelous, fudgy brownie recipe. It got to where I'd see it on just about every major recipe site and cooking blog. I finally decided I had to try it.
Apparently it is a Hepburn family recipe, which Ms. Katharine shared with Liz Smith in a 1975 interview for Ladies' Home Journal. I haven't seen a copy of this article, so I haven't confirmed that, but oh my goodness I would like to.
I eat gluten and dairy free, so I made this with butter substitute and gluten free flour. The results were yummy, even with the substitutions.
Flour, sugar, salt, vanilla, eggs, butter and unsweetened baking chocolate. All the basics.
Here's what I did:
I melted 8 tablespoons of butter and 2 squares of unsweetened chocolate in a small saucepan over low to medium-ish heat.
See how delicious and chocolatey it already looks?
Then I took the mixture off the stove and beat in one cup of sugar, two eggs and 1/4 teaspoon vanilla. Get it mixed together really well.
I got pretty good results using a small spatula to mix things up. It was a challenge to keep all that stuff in such a little pan, so maybe something slightly bigger than I used would be best.
Then I stirred in 1/4 cup flour and 1/4 teaspoon salt. The recipe also calls for one cup of chopped walnuts, but I don't like anything competing with the chocolate in my brownies, so I left them out.
The recipe suggests pouring the batter into a greased and floured 8x8 inch pan. I love how much easier clean-up is with parchment paper, so I used that to line the pan instead.
Then I popped them in a 325 degrees farenheit oven for 40 minutes.
Slightly chewy, with a bit of crispness on the outside and so fudgy and chocolatey.
It took me a few tries to get the results I wanted. The first batch was a bit too crisp, but okay. Then the second batch was so shiny and crispy that it was like eating hard candy. I finally figured out that I was just baking them slightly too long. My oven runs hot, so slightly under 40 minutes ended up working for me. It is definitely a good idea to keep an eye on them after about 35 minutes.
I liked this recipe. It's easy for a fairly novice baker like myself and it doesn't take much time to make. This will definitely be my new go-to recipe for future evening chocolate cravings.
Here's the full recipe, which I got from Epicurious (I haven't seen much, if any variation among different versions on the Web).
· 1 stick (8 tablespoons) butter
· 2 squares unsweetened chocolate
· 1 cup sugar
· 2 eggs
· 1/2 teaspoon vanilla
· 1/4 cup all-purpose flour
· 1/4 teaspoon salt
· 1 cup chopped walnuts (optional)
1. Melt together 1 stick butter and 2 squares unsweetened chocolate and take the saucepan off the heat.
2. Stir in 1 cup sugar, add 2 eggs and 1/2 teaspoon vanilla, and beat the mixture well.
3. Stir in 1/4 cup all-purpose flour and 1/4 teaspoon salt. (In the original recipe, 1 cup chopped walnuts is added here as well.)
4. Bake the brownies in a buttered and floured 8-inch-square pan at 325°F for about 40 minutes.
Give it a try--and let me know what you think if you do!
Hepburn Image Source